But it only documents on Underscore templates.ĪngularJS implements a two-way binding process thus, it is a bit more complex than Backbone.js.īackbone doesn’t provide any data binding and has a simple and more straightforward API than AngularJS.ĪngularJS mainly focuses on valid HTML and dynamic elements that mirror the underlying data to rebuild the DOM per the specified rules. Google also backs it.īackbone.js also has good community support. For big or multi-paged applications, it is less preferred than AngularJS.ĪngularJS has significant community support and extensive documentation libraries. Mainly in the case of an extensive application, testing is smoother through this framework.īackbone.js doesn’t provide any data binding process, and thus it mainly provides a swift testing experience for a single page or smaller applications. Unit testing is preferred in Angular than Backbone. These templates are not as fully-featured as those offered by Angular. But for larger pages, it is not preferred as it doesn’t do any data binding process.ĪngularJS works on MVS architecture, using two-way data binding to drive application activity.īackbone.js uses MVP architecture and doesn’t provide any data binding process.ĪngularJS offers the template through dynamic HTML attributes, which developers add to the document to create an easy-to-understand application at a functional level.īackbone.js uses Underscore templates. It extends HTML with new attributes.īackbone.js is a lightweight javascript library with a RESTful JSON interface that offers an MVC framework.ĪngularJS is a known open-source framework that provides impactful performance for larger pages and offers a two-way data binding process.īackbone.js provides much faster performance than AngularJS in the case of small data sets or small pages. The main differences between Angular and Backbone are as follows: BASIS FOR COMPARISONĪngularJS is an open-source javascript-based front-end web application framework. AngularJS mainly focuses on valid HTML dynamic elements, whereas Backbone.js relies upon direct DOM manipulation to represent data changes.Angular uses MVC, whereas Backbone uses MVP architectures.js can provide greater flexibility according to the different features that need to be incorporated into the app.Also, from the development perspective, unit testing is smoother in AngularJS than in Backbone.js In the case of the performance aspect, Backbone.js is faster than AngularJS for small data sets.Angular has more considerable community support than Backbone.js.Backbone is mainly used in the case of a small web page or small data set development process. AngularJS uses a two-way data binding process, whereas Backbone.js doesn’t provide any data binding process, so it is unsuitable for extensive web page development. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |